"The reality is not what happens to us but what we do with what happens to us."
Aldous Huxley.
events occur. We call this reality and raffiguriamocela metaphorically as a transmitting station. We receive through our senses, we interpret the signal and decode. So we operate.
But, as we interpret the signal and decode it? As for what appears on our screens mental resembles reality?
usually very little ... To stay in the metaphor
receive a signal with excessive noise. This is because at every event we project an interpretative filter son of our desires, our fears and our habits.
look all through this filter and the reality is inevitably distorted by it.
speak with a person, the look, but do not see, because our filter projected over an interpretation, rather than see what it gives us such a filter. Depending on what role we understand each other through intervening correspondence or less in the mix of patterns and habits that role evokes in us. This person becomes our eyes great or terrible, interesting or stupid. Yet almost nothing has come of it as he actually is.
not see the others we interact with our projections.
and ignoring it, or forget it, that one is so caught up in our projections to do other things that we never will dream lucidly to do ... In defense of a position "absolutely certain" of which we see someone murdered just a representation of fact illusory. Both the "small" daily massacre of people who claim to love ourselves, that the great wars.
As sad as it might seem normal to misunderstand the true nature of a person physically and culturally distant, however, are the most intimate ones who know less. It is better that we project on their expectations, prejudices, dreams, fantasies, fears and habits.
Two people aware and mindful of what could possibly go further, but otherwise this is impossible. Disguised adorning ourselves with this mechanism redundant words of love, dignity, honesty, etc.. Love exists but is very different. We live in the cage of our projections.
should know yourself as it is in us who live outside the filters that we project. Observe, have knowledge of automation. Risk, however, easily observed and analyzed but believe that it is not, is to create a witness who is aware of our imagination, beyond a review or criticism, mere presence. Knowing our dynamic we know a little 'filters, learning case that feeling that we are testing is the daughter of our projections, does not come from outside. Knowing this reduces the projections and provides, perhaps, open to the perception of reality and of others.
is mostly a question of sincerity, the most difficult of all things ... It should be a lot of courage to be honest .... sincerity is hampered by the fear of injury. The discovery of these dynamics (as it is stated, not to believe or argue) could also easily slide into the largest of the lies, the "spiritual", creating a filter even more solid.
The real discussion without glare filters, surprises, surprise, it seems new every time. What frightens us and pushing to anchor in the "certainties". But only by removing the filters there is a possibility of perceiving the signal that conveys the reality.
I'm cleaning up the "radio".
I do not know how to do well but I found that can not be viewed until you project.
0 comments:
Post a Comment